These are great questions and I am sure they will be raised before the court. But my premise is that the “compelling interest” is based on the notion that personhood occurs at conception, which is not, as I said, medically or legally established (on the contrary, the whole viability standard is explicitly contrary) and I think SCOTUS can well defer to individual choice for pre-viability status, guided as any woman deems appropriate, by faith. The Satanic Temple may raise a RFRA claim, but it’s harder to make an opt-in (to a procedure or treatment) than opt-out, I think.

Written by

Movie critic, corporate critic and shareholder advocate, critic/editor at @ebertvoices @moviemom, and #corpgov #movies and editor at @miniverpress

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store